Categories
Gay marriage equality Reflections Uncategorized

Why Are Some Christians So Angry at the Moment?

Given stories like this in the press currently, and all the ongoing hoo-ha about gay marriage, I thought it was about time I get my act together and write something about how my Christian beliefs work with the fact I am getting married to another man.

The first thing to say about Christianity is that it is – literally – a very broad church. It’s a label that is applied to all sorts of faith communities – from high-Catholic masses to small Quaker meetings – and what I talk about will only apply to a relatively small element of it. For my part, I grew up as part of a ‘charismatic new church’ (the cultural shorthand for which would be ‘happy-clappy’) in an environment where people regularly spoke in tongues, prophesied the future and prayed for healing. My church also did lots of good and practical things, such as lunchtime concerts for elderly people and going to Romania in the early 90s to bring plumbing and heating to orphanages, but in general the activity of my church was so focussed on the wider epic canvas of global revival that it rarely lowered itself into the down-and-dirty world of things like homosexuality.

My church was also part of the ‘evangelical’ stream of Christianity, which meant it was strongly bible focussed and believed that the bible is a handbook for everyday life. And so when I was in my early teens (and aware that I fancied boys rather than girls) and stumbled across this bit of Leviticus…

“Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.” Leviticus 18:22

… I found it bizarrely encouraging. You see, I was in a church that believed in healing, and as homosexuality was so clearly against the will of God all I needed to do was keep quiet and pray hard enough and eventually God would heal me. Brilliant!  So I never told anyone about what I was feeling at the time, and there was never any explicit condemnation from the front of the church, so I was actually shielded in a lot of ways from the worst that evangelical Christianity could have thrown at me. I firmly believe that had I told my church leaders in my teens what I was feeling, and they had tried to ‘heal’ me, it would have been a disaster and a one-way ticket to the loony-bin. Looks like my chronic fear of rejection was good for something after all!

It wasn’t until I was 24 that I decided to actively figure out what being gay meant for me as a Christian. I read a ton of books about what the bible has to say about homosexuality and came to the conclusion that – well – the bible has precisely nothing to say about homosexuality. On one hand you’ve got a load of ancient sacramental purification laws from the Old Testament, and anyone really enforcing those needs to take a long hard look at themselves, as well as changing their eating habits and ditching half their wardrobe (thank you President Bartlett). Then on the other hand you’ve got a collection of letters written two thousand years ago to a group of churches in the eastern Mediterranean. These letters by Paul do talk about how “homosexual offenders” as well as other miscreants (hello “drunkards”) will not inherit the Kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6 v9-10). But what I found in my research was that the Greek word now translated as “homosexual offenders” (‘arsenokoitai’ – fact fans) is still hotly debated as to what it means.

I was faced with a choice. Did I choose to base my entire life around a translation issue from a 2,000 year old letter just in case it turns out that one particular group of biblical scholars have got it right? Frankly, that just seemed bizarre to me. And still does. So I decided to play it by ear. I would still live my life according to the important bits of Christianity (you know: the stuff about loving other people, and trying to make the world a better place) but I would also start dating boys. I figured that if the two were completely incompatible it would soon become obvious. But 11 years later I still reckon I’m on the right track.

But many other vocal Christians out there appear to believe differently. Why? Well, I suspect it’s because they’ve grown up in a culture where homosexuality is seen as a bit ‘icky’, and because a few passages of the bible chime with their own personal feelings of ‘ickiness’, they have no problem believing that it is biblical truth, and therefore current and relevant. What this means is that if anyone comes along to challenge the evangelical church’s negative stance on homosexuality, this challenge becomes interpreted as an attack on biblical truth, and consequently becomes an attack on the entire belief structure. This goes some way to explaining the wide-ranging popularity of the ‘Coalition for Marriage’s online petition against gay marriage. The Coalition for Marriage have framed the argument for gay marriage as an attack on faith itself, not just a criticism of one specific inequality.

I must admit that for many different reasons, my sexuality among them, I’m not regularly attending any church at the moment. But I still would call myself a Christian and still spend a lot of time with other Christians. And the Christians I choose to spend time with are the ones understand that the bible says much more about including and loving everyone than it does about being gay. I’ve been totally accepted and encouraged by most of my Christian friends, and they’ve also welcomed Donny as well. I think there probably have been a few people who have a problem with me living openly as gay, but I guess they were the ones who stopped sending me Christmas cards, or have defriended me on Facebook. I can live with that.

But I do recognise this has created a tension for a few of my Christian friends. On the one hand they absolutely want to stay friends, but on the other hand there are these institutions they have always respected telling them that gay marriage is an attack on core Christian values. This leads to an unhealthy schizophrenia – the person who I sit down and have a natter with over a coffee is the same person who worries that coming to my wedding is against their beliefs. It’s unhealthy – and it’s really terrible of groups like the Coalition for Marriage and the ‘Core Issues Trust’ (who were behind the bus adverts) to put people in the position where they feel forced to choose between their gay friends and their beliefs.

I firmly believe you can hold on to both.

15 replies on “Why Are Some Christians So Angry at the Moment?”

Thanks for sharing!
The longer I journey through life as a follower of Jesus, the more I believe in live you life & let others live theirs. Jesus said that the two most important commands were “Love God and love people”. At the end of the day that is what its all about.
(Directed here from your Dad’s Facebook page).

A really good article Chris; thank you for writing it. And I love that link to West Wing. Undoing firmly held beliefs is hard…really hard, and it’s a new journey that many of us are on, realising as you say, that loving people, just people, must always be at the top of the bill.
A

Good article Chris! As a former member of your former ‘happy clappy’ church (when you were a youngster), I do remember that it was homophobic (I can remember people at the front saying that AIDS was God’s punishment etc) – although as a married gay man at the time I was living a terrible lie.
I had asked for help from a couple of the leaders before I married, but their response (We don’t feel there is anything ‘wrong’ with you) was, I fear, more of an attempt to make the problem go away rather than to actually help me come to terms with things.
I am now well and truly ‘out’ and have been with my partner, Alan, for more years now than I was with my wife (15). We had our Civil Partnership some years ago – and realising how far our society has moved forwards still makes me quite emotional.
I am no longer a Christian, although not because of the ‘gay’ issue. I too lost a lot of friends when I came out – some I had known for over twenty years (from school days). It was this lack of integrity in the relationships that convinced me that there is no supernatural force at work among Christians – realising, just like all other institutions that churches are first and foremost clubs – groups of like minded people joined by common activity and beliefs. From the outside they look more and more ridiculous.
Interestingly the people I am still close to of faith are those who are not dogmatic, who chose love always over theology and who are as far from fundamentalist as it is possible to be, yet remaining believers. I love those people for their integrity and humanity – refusing to allow an old book to dictate bigotry into their lives, and allowing their inherent goodness to trump the religion.
You are a credit to yourself and your parents.

Sorry, but I feel compelled to comment. I write as a heterosexual, although I went through a homosexual phase in my youth. I know you will never agree with me, but I still want to express my view.
The thing that annoys me most is the quantity of loose thinking that exists over the subject of “Gay marriage”.
Let me first say that the Bible describes God as being love – in the very essence of His being, so His disciples are also called to love mankind. But the Bible also describes God as being light. So Christians are called to be light in the world. The main problem is that most of us have difficulty in getting the balance right between light and love.

I think definitions are important, and to me “marriage” must include, amongst other purposes, procreation – the production and bringing up of children. There can never be equality with heterosexual couples until 2 men or 2 women living together can procreate by themselves.
So why this desire to hijack the word “marriage” and change its meaning, other than mimicry, or being seen as “normal”? (The word “gay” has already been treated in this way.) And what would the difference be in using the word “marriage”, rather than “civil partnership”?

Hi Andrew

I understand your attempt to try and define marriage via objective criteria, but it doesn’t quite work for me. Donny and I, as consenting adults who love each other, will be making a solemn commitment to each other that will be witnessed by our family and friends. Socially and culturally, that equals “marriage” so that’s how we describe it. It requires a lot less explanation than telling people we are getting a “civil partnership” although that’s the reality of it. I don’t see how our calling it a marriage, or being allowed to call it a marriage legally, challenges the truth of the Christian good news. It’s a peripheral issue at best.

Also, I have some close friends who have just found out they cannot have children by natural means. I don’t want to be the one to tell them their marriage can no longer be technically be called a marriage.

Anyway – thanks for posting your thoughts.

Andrew,
I’m not sure whether you were replying to my comments (that’s where your post has appeared).
You’ll note I didn’t use the word ‘marriage’ in my post, however I would like to respond.
Until recently I’ve never felt strongly about using the word ‘marriage’ about my partnership, although interestingly enough most of our friends and family have always seemed to refer to us as ‘married’ rather than ‘civilly partnered’.
Lately though, having witnessed the outrageous and thinly disguised hatred being expressed towards the campaigners for equal marriage rights, I am now a supporter of that cause. Why?
1. Words evolve and change – and the word ‘marriage’ has many uses in our language today (e.g. a ‘marriage of minds’ etc – it has come to mean a simple joining, or unifying. That to me is what any committed relationship is all about.
2. Equality. I don’t think the government should enshrine in law inequality or be partisan in its support for one religion over another. Indeed I am a secularist and believe the state and religion should be completely separate. Therefore, the state should only provide the legal contract and stay out of religious difference. Whether that is called a ‘civil partnership’, ‘marriage contract’, or ‘legal joining’ I am little bothered about – but it should be the same for everyone, gay and straight.
3. I don’t think the state should dictate to religious groups what they can and can’t do in their own ceremonies, and as such I would require everyone who wants a ‘legal’ contract to only be able to get it from a registrar. What churches then do in their own services is up to them (much as many smaller religions have to do today) – if they want to have services to celebrate gay weddings they should be allowed to.
4. You make a technical difference between ‘procreation’ and ‘child-rearing’. Procreation, as Chris has said, is not always possible for straight people, and indeed many do not wish to have children. This does not mean their partnerships shouldn’t be referred to as marriages? And secondly many gay couples are now rearing children (whether through adoption or surrogacy). I think you are counting angels dancing on pin heads to attempt such analysis.
I would enourage anyone who would deny others what they want in the name of linguistic purity to examine their motivations very deeply indeed.

Good piece Chris. I think you summed things up very well. I trust that all Christians who are seeking to find their way through the issue of homosexuality will spend as much time researching the issue. They may come to a different point of view then you have, but at least it will be an informed one. Using scripture on its own without actively seeking God’s perspective is always risky. I believe in scripture but I need to also know God’s heart on the issue. For me you can’t take out the spiritual element from Christianity, otherwise I agree you do indeed just have a club.

Hello all. And thanks so much for the comments. As this is a contentious topic, I want to add some quick housekeeping rules on commenting.
1- All comments are checked by us before they appear
2 – Any commenter using fake contact details will not be published. We want the opportunity to answer people’s issues and problems directly via email
3 – Any comment which is nothing more than a personal attack on other commenters will not be published. We want to encourage intelligent and reasoned discourse.

[post has been edited for length]

In Love, and in Christ, if i was to be asked the question as to where Homosexuality sits in the lives of any Christian, i would simply say this….if God the Father says that its a sinful act, where sin cannot enter into Heaven…. its not in our power to say otherwise …..On this subject, and in love…. any sin, anything which is in our lives which God the Father asks us to walk from, is guidance and direction which we either put into place in our own lives, or simply disregaurd and do our own thing … its a choice where sin is concerned in each of our lives… but we simply cannot change, misquote or alter the word of God to “Fit” into what we think is worth hearing…..
Do i think therefor that Homosexuality before God is Wrong…. my answer would have to be yes, … as is also any willful act of sin in each of our lives… will i love anyone any less ….,no….i have friends who are openly Gay…..and when i have been asked, i have shared my thoughts. in Love and in Him….
The Apostle Paul gave good guidance to a people called the Bereans and said….. dont take my word for it, search the scriptures dilligently to make sure what i am saying is the truth….
In love and in him
Tam

Hi Tam – sorry I had to edit your post, but it was almost as long as the original article!

There are two issues in what you say above that I’d like to question.

The first is that homosexuality is a “willful act of sin” as any other. I could choose to knowingly insult people, but I try not to. I could steal, but I don’t. I could lie to further my business, but I never do. I know what sin is, and what sin feels like. But my choosing to live openly as gay has brought peace, joy and a tranquility to my life, and to the lives of those around me. If we are judging sin by its fruit, then the fruit looks good to me.

Also, if you meet any gay Christian they would have already searched the scriptures extremely hard already looking for what God says about them being gay. I know I have. But I have come to a different conclusion to you. That doesn’t mean either of us have to be ‘corrected’. It just means that in order to be good human beings we have to look beyond these things and try and get on with the job of being good news.

Ive read a number of articles both from you & your dad and several others, some are for and some are against. I admire your character and strength to keep batting where many would have given up with faith altogether because of things that are said and insinuated.

I try not to judge anyone for anything they do or don’t do and obviously in a world of blame culture and judgmentalism this is hard to keep too, but I do my best.

The only question I came away with was this. If we don’t stand in anybodies way and dont judge then how can Christians have a voice in society, politics etc? Because as soon as we open our mouths to share a thought or question we would be standing in somebodies way by not agreeing with them.

[This comment has been edited for length]

Please try and keep your comments concise so they can be easily read and digested by visitors.

Any comments that are too long will be edited before they appear here.

I understand about the length of statements Chris 🙂 … but it is a subject which warrents discussion as i do agree with Pete….
I know there was obviously more to what Pete said and as you know i prattle on a bit, its just that i dont want to appear to be condemning any individual/s…but in love, there are truths involved, and the truth should never be dressed up, disguised or changed to suit ourselves, and i need to firstly speak about me and examine myself before throwing anything at anyone else. I do believe however, that God doesnt lie, and although our God is a God of Love, he is also a God of wrath (Mankind Wide) and if theres a truth, in submission, love and obedience, we are all asked to follow him.
This isnt about interpretation… thats a big subject when speaking about the Greek and Hebrew.. i think you would throw a Nanarooney if i tried to post all that lol 🙂 Its just a simple faith that we are required to imitate Christ. If by that we will be held accountable through our trust and walk with him, by showing Christ in our lives as we are asked to be Holy, its to strive (us all, without exception) to trust him for his strength and guidance so that others can see him in us, as we in our own lives flee from what he calls sin.
I think the issue may be, what man wants to class as sin? and what God classes as sin.
Tam

Apologies for the previous quantity.
I think what I was trying to say was that God’s grace should be suficient for us to not be drawn into human division.
Personal thoughts and ideas are fine and I would stand up for things that I believe, but I would not say that because someone is gay or straight, had sex before marriage, swears, get’s drunk, is a murderer, rapist, peadophile or has stolen or blasphemed etc etc etc they are not good enough to know Jesus. God’s grace is suffiecient to save and it’s down to Him when the time comes.
Let’s stop turning preference and opinion into prejudice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.